Premium
Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine and its metabolites
Author(s) -
Chalon Stephan A.,
Desager JeanPierre,
DeSante Karl A.,
Frye Reginald F.,
Witcher Jennifer,
Long Amanda J.,
Sauer JohnMichael,
Golnez JeanLuc,
Smith Brian P.,
Thomasson Holly R.,
Horsmans Yves
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1067/mcp.2003.25
Subject(s) - debrisoquine , atomoxetine , pharmacokinetics , cyp2d6 , area under the curve , urine , medicine , endocrinology , chemistry , pharmacology , cytochrome p450 , metabolism , attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , psychiatry , methylphenidate
Background and Objectives Atomoxetine is a treatment for attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder and is primarily eliminated via cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6). The pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine and its primary metabolites were investigated in 10 adults with hepatic impairment (6 moderate, 4 severe) and 10 age‐ and sex‐matched control subjects, all being genotyped as CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. Methods A single oral 20‐mg dose of atomoxetine was given. Multiple blood samples were collected for 48 hours in healthy subjects and for 120 hours in patients. Urine was collected up to 24 hours. Before atomoxetine administration (10–20 days), sorbitol clearance and debrisoquin (INN, debrisoquine) metabolic ratio were determined as markers of hepatic blood flow and CYP2D6 activity, respectively. Results The systemic clearance of atomoxetine was significantly reduced in those with hepatic impairment compared with controls, thereby resulting in increased exposure (area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity, 1.58 versus 0.85 μg · h −1 · mL −1 ; P = .035) but no change in maximum concentration. Mean 4‐hydroxyatomoxetine area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to time t and maximum concentration were increased approximately 7‐fold and 2‐fold, respectively ( P = .0001 and P = .0056, respectively). For the glucuronide conjugate of 4‐hydroxyatomoxetine, the mean half‐life was longer and the mean area under the concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity and the maximum concentration were lower ( P = .0028, P = .003, and P = .0001, respectively). The sorbitol clearance was lower and the debrisoquin metabolic ratio was higher, reflecting reduced hepatic blood flow and decreased CYP2D6 activity, respectively. Decreased atomoxetine clearance in patients with hepatic impairment was clearly correlated with decreased CYP2D6 activity and decreased hepatic blood flow. Mean atomoxetine plasma protein binding was lower in patients with hepatic impairment compared with controls (96.5% versus 98.7%, P = .0008). Atomoxetine was well tolerated in the 2 populations. Conclusion For patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder who have hepatic impairment, dosage adjustment is recommended. Initial target doses should be reduced to 25% and 50% of the normal dose for patients with severe and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2003) 73 , 178–191; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2003.25