Premium
Immunosuppressive therapy regimen and platelet activation in renal transplant patients
Author(s) -
Graff Jochen,
Klinkhardt Ute,
Harder Sebastian,
Wegert Wolfgang,
Lenz Tomas,
Scheuermann ErnstHeinrich,
Gossmann Jan
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1067/mcp.2002.127115
Subject(s) - azathioprine , medicine , platelet , platelet activation , gastroenterology , ciclosporin , tacrolimus , mycophenolic acid , transplantation , pharmacology , endocrinology , disease
Background Increased platelet activation caused by an immunosuppressive therapy regimen may contribute to the high incidence of death from cardiovascular disease in renal transplant patients. Cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) and azathioprine are reported to activate platelets, but data are rare and controversial for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Methods This cross‐sectional study assessed markers of platelet degranulation (P‐selectin; CD62), the activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor (PAC1, indicating the fibrinogen binding site), platelet aggregation, and secretion of platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF AB ) in renal transplant patients treated with 4 different therapy regimens. Immunosuppression was based on low‐dose steroids (5 mg/d prednisone) in combination with a single agent: (1) cyclosporine (n = 16), (2) azathioprine (n = 18), (3) tacrolimus (n = 17), or (4) mycophenolate mofetil (n = 13). Effects were compared with those in an age‐matched control group of patients with hypertension (n = 11). Results In all renal transplant patient groups, unactivated platelets exhibited an increased expression of CD62. When stimulated with 2‐μmol/L thrombin receptor‐activating peptide, CD62 expression in platelets from patients treated with azathioprine (63% ± 17%; P < .05), cyclosporine (51% ± 23%; P < .05), and tacrolimus (50% ± 22%; P < .05) was elevated compared with control subjects (33% ± 19%). PAC1 expression was significantly increased in the patient groups that received azathioprine and cyclosporine. PDGF AB secretion was elevated in patients treated with azathioprine only (51 ± 24 ng/10 9 platelets [versus 35 ± 17 ng/10 9 platelets for control subjects]; P < .05). Platelet aggregation in response to collagen (0.5 μg/mL) was decreased in patients treated with tacrolimus (49% ± 29%; P < .05) and mycophenolate mofetil (55% ± 32%; P < .05) compared with control subjects (73% ± 25%). Conclusion This is the first study to compare the effects on platelet function of different immunosuppressive regimens that are based on monotherapy. All renal transplant patients showed preactivated platelets compared with those of patients with hypertension. However, the “newer” immunosuppressive agents tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil seemed to have fewer unfavorable effects on platelet CD62 expression and PAC1 expression and aggregation. Whether this finding is accompanied by fewer cardiovascular events remains to be elucidated. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2002) 72 , 411–418; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.127115