z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Awkward states and regional organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia compared
Author(s) -
Philomena Murray,
Alex WarleighLack,
Baogang He
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
comparative european politics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.743
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 1740-388X
pISSN - 1472-4790
DOI - 10.1057/cep.2013.2
Subject(s) - kingdom , regionalism (politics) , political science , comparative politics , politics , phenomenon , international relations , political economy , regional studies , power (physics) , european union , identity (music) , economy , sociology , law , international trade , economics , regional science , regional development , democracy , paleontology , physics , quantum mechanics , biology , acoustics
Both the United Kingdom and Australia have been studied by specialists in each region rather than by comparativists. This article seeks to fill this gap by examining the regional ‘awkwardness’ of the United Kingdom and Australia comparatively. Australia and Britain are ‘awkward’ states in their respective regions – Asia and Europe. This is clear in their approaches to institutions, economic policy, security and identity. We examine comparatively the role of power, institutions, economy, domestic politics and culture to see which mix best accounts for the awkward status of these two states. Through this comparison, this article demonstrates that the so-called ‘uniqueness’ of the United Kingdom in regionalism literature is in fact a nearly ‘universal’ phenomenon, insofar as many global regions include awkward states

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom