z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery
Author(s) -
William F. Fearon,
Frederik M. Zimmermann,
Bernard De Bruyne,
Zsolt Piróth,
Albert H.M. van Straten,
L Székely,
Giedrius Davidavičius,
Gintaras Kalinauskas,
Samer Mansour,
Rajesh Kharbanda,
Nikolaos Östlund-Papadogeorgos,
Adel Aminian,
Keith G. Oldroyd,
Nawwar AlAttar,
Nikola Jagić,
JanHenk E. Dambrink,
Petr Kala,
Oskar Angerås,
Philip MacCarthy,
Olaf Wendler,
Filip Casselman,
Nils Witt,
Kreton Mavromatis,
Steven E.S. Miner,
Jaydeep Sarma,
Thomas Engstrøm,
Evald Høj Christiansen,
Pim A.L. Tonino,
Michael J. Reardon,
Di Lu,
Victoria Y. Ding,
Yuhei Kobayashi,
Mark A. Hlatky,
Kenneth W. Mahaffey,
Manisha Desai,
Y. Joseph Woo,
Alan C. Yeung,
Nico H.J. Pijls
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
new england journal of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1533-4406
pISSN - 0028-4793
DOI - 10.1056/nejmoa2112299
Subject(s) - fractional flow reserve , conventional pci , cardiology , medicine , bypass surgery , coronary flow reserve , coronary artery disease , artery , coronary angiography , myocardial infarction
Patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease have been found to have better outcomes with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) than with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but studies in which PCI is guided by measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been lacking.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom