Immediate versus Delayed IUD Insertion after Uterine Aspiration | Zendy

Paula Bednarek | Zendy; Mitchell D. Creinin | Zendy; Matthew F. Reeves | Zendy; Carrie Cwiak | Zendy; Eve Espey | Zendy; Jeffrey T. Jensen | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Immediate versus Delayed IUD Insertion after Uterine Aspiration

Author(s) -

Paula Bednarek,

Mitchell D. Creinin,

Matthew F. Reeves,

Carrie Cwiak,

Eve Espey,

Jeffrey T. Jensen

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

new england journal of medicine

Language(s) - Uncategorized

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 19.889

H-Index - 1030

eISSN - 1533-4406

pISSN - 0028-4793

DOI - 10.1056/nejmoa1011600

Subject(s) - medicine , intrauterine device , confidence interval , abortion , randomization , randomized controlled trial , surgery , vacuum aspiration , family planning , obstetrics , population , gynecology , pregnancy , research methodology , environmental health , biology , genetics

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) provide highly effective, reversible, long-term contraception that is appropriate for many women after first-trimester uterine aspiration. However, the effects of immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration on rates of complications and IUD use are uncertain.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research