z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Childhood Distal Forearm Fracture Incidence in Malmö, Sweden 1950 to 2016
Author(s) -
Erika Bergman,
Vasileios Lempesis,
Lars Jehpsson,
Björn Rosengren,
Magnus K. Karlsson
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of wrist surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.125
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2163-3924
pISSN - 2163-3916
DOI - 10.1055/s-0040-1720965
Subject(s) - medicine , incidence (geometry) , forearm , confidence interval , epidemiology , pediatrics , rate ratio , demography , population , surgery , environmental health , physics , sociology , optics
Background  Distal forearm fracture is the most common pediatric fracture. As studies have indicated time trends in fracture incidence, we wanted to update the epidemiology and estimate time trends between 1950 and 2016 in Malmö, Sweden. Methods  The city of Malmö, Sweden, had 318,107 inhabitants (58,585 of the population was aged <16 years) in 2014 and one hospital. We, therefore, used the hospital diagnosis registry and hospital medical records to identify and classify distal forearm fractures 2014 to 2016 in children aged 0 to 15 years. For long-term trend calculations, we also included published data from 1950 to 2006 (resulting in 17 evaluated years) and used joinpoint regression to estimate annual percent changes (APC). To describe differences in incidence between two periods, we calculated incident rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to describe uncertainty. Results  Childhood distal forearm fracture incidence in 2014 to 2016 was 546/100,000 person-years (660 in boys and 427 in girls). The age-adjusted incidence in 2014 to 2016 and in 2005 to 2006 was similar (boys IRR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.2 and girls IRR 1.1, 95% CI: 0.9-1.3). Time-trend analyses from 1950 to 2016 revealed increasing age-adjusted incidence in both boys (APC +0.9%, 95% CI: 0.7-1.2) and girls (APC +0.6%, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9). Conclusion  Distal forearm fracture incidence was similar in 2014 to 2016 and in 2005 to 2006. Age-adjusted incidence had increased in both sexes from 1950 to 2016. Level of Evidence  This is a Level III b study.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here