
Long-Term Results of Universal 2 Total Wrist Arthroplasty
Author(s) -
Hero J. A. Zijlker,
M. J. P. F. Ritt,
Cees B. IJsselstein
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of wrist surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.125
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2163-3924
pISSN - 2163-3916
DOI - 10.1055/s-0039-1685469
Subject(s) - medicine , wrist , implant , patient satisfaction , surgery , arthrodesis , arthroplasty , pathology , alternative medicine
Background The Universal 2 is a widely used total wrist implant that aims to maintain function of the wrist. Purpose Promising mid-term results of the Universal 2 total wrist implant are described in the literature. This study evaluates the long-term results in terms of implant survival and patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods Patients who received a Universal 2 implant between 2004 and 2009 were retrospectively identified through a database search. Clinical outcome and complications of the implant were assessed by examination of the patient's medical records, X-rays, and a questionnaire, consisting of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation questionnaire (PRWHE) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires and additional questions. Results Twenty-five patients (26 wrists) were included in this study. Twenty-one (81%) Universal 2 implants remained in situ after a mean follow-up of 11 years. Moderate PRWHE (44) and QuickDASH (41) scores were found in these cases. Five Universal 2 implants failed and were converted to a total wrist arthrodesis after a mean period of 9.2 years due to distal component loosening ( n = 3), recurrent luxation ( n = 1), or recurrent synovitis ( n = 1). Twenty-three (92%) patients were (very) satisfied with the Universal 2 implant. Conclusion The Universal 2 demonstrates a high (81%) implant survival with a high patient satisfaction after a mean follow-up of 11 years. Prospective studies of the Universal 2 implant are necessary to objectify improvement in wrist function and to provide a better comparison to other fourth generation wrist implants.