z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Long-Term Results of Universal 2 Total Wrist Arthroplasty
Author(s) -
Hero J. A. Zijlker,
M. J. P. F. Ritt,
Cees B. IJsselstein
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of wrist surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.125
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2163-3924
pISSN - 2163-3916
DOI - 10.1055/s-0039-1685469
Subject(s) - medicine , wrist , implant , patient satisfaction , surgery , arthrodesis , arthroplasty , pathology , alternative medicine
Background  The Universal 2 is a widely used total wrist implant that aims to maintain function of the wrist. Purpose  Promising mid-term results of the Universal 2 total wrist implant are described in the literature. This study evaluates the long-term results in terms of implant survival and patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods  Patients who received a Universal 2 implant between 2004 and 2009 were retrospectively identified through a database search. Clinical outcome and complications of the implant were assessed by examination of the patient's medical records, X-rays, and a questionnaire, consisting of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation questionnaire (PRWHE) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires and additional questions. Results  Twenty-five patients (26 wrists) were included in this study. Twenty-one (81%) Universal 2 implants remained in situ after a mean follow-up of 11 years. Moderate PRWHE (44) and QuickDASH (41) scores were found in these cases. Five Universal 2 implants failed and were converted to a total wrist arthrodesis after a mean period of 9.2 years due to distal component loosening ( n  = 3), recurrent luxation ( n  = 1), or recurrent synovitis ( n  = 1). Twenty-three (92%) patients were (very) satisfied with the Universal 2 implant. Conclusion  The Universal 2 demonstrates a high (81%) implant survival with a high patient satisfaction after a mean follow-up of 11 years. Prospective studies of the Universal 2 implant are necessary to objectify improvement in wrist function and to provide a better comparison to other fourth generation wrist implants.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here