Premium
Contributions of pain‐related adjustment and perceptions of control to coping strategy use among cervical sprain patients
Author(s) -
LaChapelle Diane L.,
Hadjistavropoulos Heather D.,
McCreary Donald R.,
Asmundson Gordon J.G.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
european journal of pain
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.305
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1532-2149
pISSN - 1090-3801
DOI - 10.1053/eujp.2001.0261
Subject(s) - coping (psychology) , situational ethics , psychology , clinical psychology , perception , social support , cognition , psychiatry , social psychology , neuroscience
Coping is a cyclical process in which an individual evaluates stressful events, chooses and implements coping strategies, re‐evaluates the outcome of the coping effort and modifies the strategy if necessary. The intent of the present study was to evaluate the extent to which pain‐related adjustment (i.e. pain severity, pain interference, negative affect) and perceptions of control are associated with the implementation of particular coping strategies. Participants were 136 patients assessed at an interdisciplinary pain clinic for cervical sprain injuries. As part of a routine assessment, participants completed a questionnaire package regarding background, pain severity, pain interference, negative affect, perceived control and use of particular coping strategies. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that pain interference, after controlling for all other variables, was associated with greater use of less physically demanding strategies (i.e. resting, guarding, asking for assistance, seeking social support and coping self‐statements). Negative affect, on the other hand, after controlling for other variables, was associated with reduced use of task persistence. Finally, perceived control, independent of other variables, was associated with greater use of cognitive and social coping strategies (i.e. asking for assistance, seeking social support and coping self‐statements). The results of the study shed light on the complex relationship between use of particular coping strategies and situational variables of pain‐related adjustment and perceived control. Implications for clinicians who assist patients via implementation or modification of particular coping techniques are discussed.