Open AccessComplete protection scheme for fault detection, classification and location estimation in HVDC transmission lines using support vector machines
Author(s) -
Johnson Jenifer Mariam,
Yadav Anamika
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
iet science, measurement and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.418
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1751-8830
pISSN - 1751-8822
DOI - 10.1049/iet-smt.2016.0244
Subject(s) - support vector machine , electric power transmission , fault (geology) , transmission line , fault detection and isolation , computer science , engineering , high voltage direct current , pattern recognition (psychology) , control theory (sociology) , voltage , artificial intelligence , direct current , telecommunications , electrical engineering , seismology , geology , actuator , control (management)
This paper presents a complete protection scheme for detecting, classifying and locating the fault in HVDC transmission lines using support vector machines (SVM). SVM has been used for protective relaying application in HVAC transmission line, however very limited works have been reported for HVDC transmission line. In this work, a ±500 kV HVDC transmission system is developed in PSCAD/EMTDC and the measurement signals obtained are analyzed in MATLAB. The rectifier side AC RMS voltage, DC voltage and current on both the poles are continuously monitored, and given as input to the SVM binary classifier in order to detect the presence of fault in the line. Once a fault is detected, the SVM multi‐class classification module predicts the type of fault and the SVM regression algorithm predicts the location of fault. The feature vector used in the classification and location modules is the standard deviation of the signals over half cycle before and after the occurrence of fault. The method proposed is simple as it requires single‐end data and a direct standard deviation of one cycle data gives very accurate results. The detection and classification modules are 100% accurate whereas the fault location module has a mean error of 0.03%.