z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of stability service cost in power grids considering different types of WTs
Author(s) -
Hashemi Yashar,
Shayeghi Hossein,
Moradzadeh Mohammad
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
iet renewable power generation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.005
H-Index - 76
ISSN - 1752-1424
DOI - 10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0351
Subject(s) - electric power system , generator (circuit theory) , computer science , stability (learning theory) , control theory (sociology) , wind power , mathematical optimization , pareto principle , power (physics) , electricity generation , reliability engineering , control engineering , control (management) , engineering , mathematics , physics , quantum mechanics , machine learning , artificial intelligence , electrical engineering
This study presents a comparative study on dynamic behaviour of two different types of wind turbines (WTs) that are widely used in power systems. Mathematical modelling of two types of WTs in the multi‐machine power system is presented, and a suitable framework for the study is provided. To compare the cost of provision of stability service by each of two different WTs, a technical–economical two‐objective optimisation problem considering damping indices and generation cost will be formulated and solved by multi‐objective gravitational search algorithm method. The presented strategy is carried out for each WT and Pareto‐optimal curves are extracted. It is shown that in a system with poor dynamic situation, expensive production units are used that this phenomenon will increase generation cost. Generation costs are analysed by considering two WTs, doubly fed asynchronous generator and permanent magnet synchronous generator and dynamic condition for each type are evaluated. Two scenarios are assumed for evaluation; the first one without retuning of stabilisers and the second one with stabilisers retuned due to system generation situation. The proposed scheme is tested on modified 16‐machine 5‐area network and simulation results are compared.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here