z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cost function‐based modulation scheme of model predictive control for VIENNA rectifier
Author(s) -
Dang Chaoliang,
Tong Xiangqian,
Song Weizhang,
Han Yuchao,
Wheeler Pat
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
iet power electronics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.637
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1755-4543
pISSN - 1755-4535
DOI - 10.1049/iet-pel.2019.0546
Subject(s) - control theory (sociology) , model predictive control , ripple , rectifier (neural networks) , total harmonic distortion , voltage , computer science , space vector modulation , pulse width modulation , engineering , control (management) , stochastic neural network , artificial intelligence , recurrent neural network , artificial neural network , machine learning , electrical engineering
Finite control set model predictive control (FCS‐MPC) has been widely used in the control of grid‐connected converters with the advantages of fast dynamics, multi‐objective control, and easy implement. However, the conventional FCS‐MPC bears with variable switching frequency, high current ripple and computational burden. An improved current model predictive with the cost function‐based modulation scheme (CFM‐MPC) is proposed for a three‐phase three‐level VIENNA rectifier to improve the power quality. First, the mathematical model and voltage vector are given according to the principle of deadbeat control. Then, the voltage vector of different voltage vectors are selected according to the location of the voltage vector reference, and the switching action time of the selected are directly calculated by the inversely proportional with cost function value of the selected vectors. It remains the merits of both the conventional MPC and space vector pulse width modulation schemes to track the optimum voltage vector without increasing the computational burden. Finally, a comparative study with the proposed CFM‐MPC and conventional FCS‐MPC has been conducted to verify the superiority of the proposed scheme. The results show the proposed CFM‐MPC has the advantages of lower power ripple, fixed switching frequency, lower total harmonic distortion and neutral point potential balance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here