z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
PBC for direct voltage regulation for the boost DC–DC converter
Author(s) -
Arora Sameer,
Balsara Poras T.,
Bhatia Dinesh K.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
iet power electronics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.637
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1755-4543
pISSN - 1755-4535
DOI - 10.1049/iet-pel.2018.5119
Subject(s) - passivity , control theory (sociology) , boost converter , inductor , ćuk converter , dissipation , voltage , controller (irrigation) , computer science , engineering , electronic engineering , control (management) , physics , electrical engineering , agronomy , artificial intelligence , biology , thermodynamics
Passivity‐based control (PBC) for a power converter is an interesting alternative to the conventional linear control technique. In general, the objective of PBC is to reshape the energy of a system, additionally damping the system to modify the dissipation structure. PBC forces the closed‐loop dynamics to behave in a manner such that the virtual damping resistances injected in the system are in series or parallel of the actual physical circuit elements. The boost converter is intrinsically non‐linear, non‐minimum phase system at the output with respect to the control input. Control techniques such as the PBC that requires some form of system inversion cannot be implemented. By using the one‐to‐one correspondence between the inductor current and the output voltage at the equilibrium point, conventional non‐linear control techniques exploit regulation of the inductor current to regulate the output voltage (indirect regulation). This study proposes passivity‐based direct output voltage regulation for a boost converter, which has multiple advantages over other non‐linear control techniques and the conventional linear controller.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here