Open AccessDynamical effects of composite output capacitors on current‐mode controlled buck converter with constant current load
Author(s) -
Leng Mingrui,
Zhou Guohua,
Liu Xiaotian,
Xu Shungang
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
iet power electronics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.637
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1755-4543
pISSN - 1755-4535
DOI - 10.1049/iet-pel.2016.0525
Subject(s) - capacitor , capacitance , electrolytic capacitor , equivalent series resistance , oscillation (cell signaling) , buck converter , control theory (sociology) , constant current , materials science , filter capacitor , physics , voltage , current (fluid) , electrical engineering , computer science , engineering , electrode , chemistry , thermodynamics , biochemistry , control (management) , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence
The discrete mapping model of current‐mode controlled buck converter with constant current load, taking account of composite output capacitors (parallel connection of two different types of capacitor branches, i.e. electrolytic capacitors and ceramic capacitors), is established. Based on the model, dynamical effects of varying output capacitance and equivalent series resistance (ESR) are investigated by bifurcation behaviours. The period of low‐frequency oscillation among coexisting fast‐slow scale instability is derived by exploring the loci of eigenvalues, while the operating regions are estimated. Time‐domain simulation and experimental waveforms are provided for verification of the theoretical analysis, indicating the existences of subharmonic oscillation and coexisting fast‐slow scale instability in the converter with variation of output capacitance and ESR. Research results reveal that the low‐frequency oscillation can be eventually eliminated due to a relatively large (or small) ESR and the capacitance in the same branch presents to identical tendency of dynamical effects on the converter. Moreover, the interaction effects between two parallel capacitor branches are demonstrated. It illustrates that the low‐frequency oscillation can be removed with smaller (or larger) ESR or capacitance in one branch of the composite output capacitors while larger (or smaller) ESR or capacitance in the other branch.