z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analytical validation of novel consequent pole E‐core stator permanent magnet flux switching machine
Author(s) -
Ullah Wasiq,
Khan Faisal,
Sulaiman Erwan,
Umair Muhammad,
Ullah Noman,
Khan Bakhtiar
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iet electric power applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1751-8679
DOI - 10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0257
Subject(s) - cogging torque , stator , torque , magnet , finite element method , torque density , magnetic flux leakage , direct torque control , control theory (sociology) , engineering , mechanical engineering , computer science , physics , electrical engineering , structural engineering , induction motor , control (management) , voltage , artificial intelligence , thermodynamics
Flux switching machines (FSMs) encompass unique features of conventional direct current machine, permanent magnet (PM) synchronous machine and switch reluctance machine. Permanent magnet FSM (PMFSM) is capable of high torque density and applicable for high‐speed application, however conventional PMFSM exhibits demerits of high PM volume, high torque ripples and significant stator flux leakage. In this paper, a novel consequent pole E‐core stator PMFSM is proposed and compared with conventional topology utilising 2D finite‐element analysis (2D‐FEA). Finite‐element analysis revealed that proposed design enhanced flux modulation effects by introducing flux bridges and flux barriers as a result reduced cogging torque by reducing 46.53% of the total PM volume, reduce torque ripples by reducing PM slot effects and reduce flux leakage utilising flux bridges in the stator. Furthermore, analytical model for flux linkages, cogging torque, mechanical torque, no load and on‐load magnetic flux density (MFD) is developed for initial design of conventional and proposed model. 2D analytical methodologies resolve equivalent magnetic circuits for open‐circuit flux linkages, Fourier analysis for cogging torque, Laplace equations for MFD and Maxwell stress tensor for mechanical torque. Finally, results obtained from 2D‐FEA and analytical methodologies are validated and compared.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here