z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Resource management in cooperative multi‐agent networks through self‐triggering
Author(s) -
Tolić Domagoj,
Jeličić Vana,
Bilas Vedran
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
iet control theory and applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.059
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1751-8652
pISSN - 1751-8644
DOI - 10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0576
Subject(s) - computer science , resource (disambiguation) , multi agent system , resource management (computing) , control theory (sociology) , distributed computing , knowledge management , business , artificial intelligence , control (management) , computer network
In this study, the author's interest is to reduce requirements posed on communication, sensing, processing and energy resources in multi‐agent networks (MANs) without compromising MAN objectives. Consequently, the hardware expenses and energy consumption are driven down while MAN multitasking, such as inter‐network collaboration, is facilitated. Scenarios, in which agents of one network need to achieve a common goal, call for the study of decentralised cooperative control schemes. To accomplish this goal in an uncertain and noisy setting and to detect changes in the communication topology, agents have to exchange information. Since each transmission and reception of information necessitates energy, communication should be induced only when the goal completion can no longer be guaranteed in order to prolong the MAN mission. Thus, the authors devise an information exchange mechanism which draws upon the ideas of self‐triggered communication. The proposed mechanism is inspected both theoretically and experimentally (employing off‐the‐shelf wireless sensor platforms) for performance against lifetime trade‐offs using a single‐integrator consensus case study. Their mechanism is applicable to heterogeneous agents with exogenous disturbances, to directed switching communication topologies and to both initial‐condition‐dependent and initial‐condition‐independent long‐term cooperative behaviours. The investigated stability notions include ℒ p ‐ and input‐to‐state stability (with respect to a set).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here