Open Access3DEOR: an opportunity routing protocol using evidence theory appropriate for 3D urban environments in VANETs
Author(s) -
Bozorgzadeh Elham,
Barati Hamid,
Barati Ali
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
iet communications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.355
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1751-8636
pISSN - 1751-8628
DOI - 10.1049/iet-com.2020.0473
Subject(s) - computer science , computer network , stateless protocol , network packet , routing protocol , relay , vehicular ad hoc network , dissemination , geographic routing , wireless ad hoc network , zone routing protocol , node (physics) , wireless routing protocol , wireless , telecommunications , power (physics) , physics , structural engineering , quantum mechanics , engineering
The vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) is a promising technology to improve the comfort and safety of passengers, roads and urban traffic. Applications applied to VANETs require efficient routing protocols. Urban environments include tunnels, subways, overpasses, and multilevel highways, which indicate the multilevel information environment and specific conditions of radio channel dissemination. In this paper proposed a three‐dimensional (3D) evidence theory based, opportunistic routing protocol, called 3DEOR, which address the above issues using a new hybrid criterion called PAL. The PAL criterion includes three metrics of packet delivery probability to compensate for unreliable dissemination environments, packet advancement appropriated to 3D environments to reduce the number of hop counts and level to improve link connectivity. Prioritise the relay set members based on the new criteria to select the best relay node. In cases where there is no certainty, the evidence theory can be a good choice for combining the three metrics of the PAL criterion. The simulation results show the superiority of the proposed protocol over the 3D link state aware geographic opportunistic (3DLSGO) and 3D greedy perimeter stateless routing (3DGPSR) protocols in network performance indices such as packet delivery rate, end‐to‐end delay and average hop count.