z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
3‐D magnetic equivalent circuit model for a coreless axial flux permanent‐magnet synchronous generator
Author(s) -
Zhang Yunpeng,
Wang Yiming,
Gao Shuning
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
iet electric power applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.815
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1751-8679
pISSN - 1751-8660
DOI - 10.1049/elp2.12092
Subject(s) - magnetic field , magnetic circuit , magnet , counter electromotive force , magnetic flux leakage , finite element method , permanent magnet synchronous generator , magnetic flux , electromotive force , air gap (plumbing) , electrical engineering , mechanics , leakage (economics) , magnetic reactance , magnetic energy , physics , engineering , mechanical engineering , voltage , materials science , structural engineering , magnetization , quantum mechanics , macroeconomics , economics , composite material
In coreless axial flux permanent magnet synchronous generators (AFPMSGs), magnetic leakage and fringing effect is significant due to the large air gap and increases the difficulty in magnetic field calculation. This paper presents a 3‐D magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) model for the magnetic field calculation in coreless AFPMSGs by considering the magnetic leakage and fringing flux. Field distribution is calculated based on the magnetic circuit analysis. The magnetic flux in the air gap between the permanent magnets is analysed using the magnetic field division method. Compared with the traditional magnetic circuit model, the magnetic leakage from PM to the rotor iron plates is considered in both radial and tangential directions in the proposed model. The proposed MEC method is applied to a specific AFPMSG, and the magnetic field distribution, no‐load back electromotive force (EMF), and torque are calculated and compared with finite elements (FEM) results. AFPMSG machines with different pole‐arc ratios are prototyped to validate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed 3‐D MEC model. The results obtained by the proposed MEC model are in good agreement with those of the FEM and experimental results.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here