z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Phase sequence interchange scheme for suppressing transient cross regulation on the compensator controlled and non‐compensator controlled single‐inductor dual‐output buck converter
Author(s) -
Wu ChunHsun,
Chen BuWei,
Ko WeiHung,
Liu ChihWei,
ChangChien LeRen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
iet circuits, devices and systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.251
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1751-8598
pISSN - 1751-858X
DOI - 10.1049/cds2.12062
Subject(s) - control theory (sociology) , inductor , transient (computer programming) , transient response , buck converter , controller (irrigation) , computer science , voltage , engineering , control (management) , electrical engineering , agronomy , artificial intelligence , biology , operating system
Single input multiple output (SIMO) buck converter is a good solution to enhance the area efficiency of the power management unit. Because the SIMO type buck converter uses only one inductor to buffer the transferred energy for the multiple output ports, it usually suffers from severe transient cross regulation in a continuous conduction mode. Most of the well‐known approaches to suppress the transient cross regulation are either to create the additional free‐wheeling loop or to refine the controller loop. The control logic is usually quite specific which may not apply to the other controller types controller. A phase sequence interchange (PSI) scheme is proposed to mitigate the transient cross regulation without modifying the original control design. Compared to the other techniques, the proposed method can be easily applied, but not limited to the compensator‐based control or the non‐compensator‐based control in the buck converter. This study starts with the illustration of the reason why the PSI can mitigate the transient cross regulation. Detail designs are then presented to implement the proposed scheme on both the compensator type and the non‐compensator type controls. Experimental results show that the suppression of the cross regulation is comparable to the other state of the arts.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here