Premium
Induction of cotton extrafloral nectar production in response to herbivory does not require a herbivore‐specific elicitor
Author(s) -
Wäckers F.L.,
Wunderlin R.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
entomologia experimentalis et applicata
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.765
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1570-7458
pISSN - 0013-8703
DOI - 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00477.x
Subject(s) - nectar , herbivore , biology , spodoptera littoralis , lepidoptera genitalia , noctuidae , botany , elicitor , plant defense against herbivory , plant tolerance to herbivory , gossypium , pollen , biochemistry , gene
The production of extrafloral nectar is thought to represent an indirect plant defense, as it allows plants to recruit natural enemies which can protect the plant against herbivore attacks. In previous work we demonstrated that plants may show a strong increase in extrafloral nectar secretion in response to herbivory. Here we address the question of whether this induction is herbivory‐specific, or simply a general response to tissue damage. We compared the level of induction in Gossypium herbaceum (L.) (Malvaceae) following either herbivory by Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) or mechanical damage with and without the addition of S. littoralis regurgitate. Both herbivore feeding and mechanical damage significantly raised nectar production. No difference in volume or pattern of nectar secretion was found between natural and mechanical damage, nor between artificially damaged plants treated with regurgitate or water. Our findings indicate that the induction of extrafloral nectar secretion constitutes a general response by the plant to tissue damage, rather than representing a herbivory‐specific mechanism. The costs and benefits of such a non‐specific strategy for the plant are discussed.