z-logo
Premium
Validation of Transesophageal Echocardiography to Determine Physiologic Coronary Flow
Author(s) -
Chaudhry Farooq A.,
Ren JianFang,
Ramani Kishin,
Yaacoub Adel S.,
Kane Bonnie J.,
Greene Rodney,
McPherson David D.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2001.00553.x
Subject(s) - doppler effect , doppler echocardiography , blood flow , hemodynamics , medicine , flow (mathematics) , biomedical engineering , nuclear medicine , diastole , cardiology , physics , mechanics , blood pressure , astronomy
Human studies have suggested that Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can determine normal physiologic coronary blood flow (CBF) and alterations in CBF due to proximal flow‐limiting stenoses. However, assessment of CBF by Doppler TEE has not been validated. To determine if true estimation of CBF could be obtained with Doppler TEE, seven mongrel dogs (weight range 28 kg–36 kg) were evaluated. Simultaneous CBF determinations by Doppler TEE and epicardial electromagnetic flow (EMF) and/or epicardial Doppler flow (EDF) probes were compared. Measurements were obtained at baseline and following varying degrees of proximal coronary occlusion, which produced reactive hyperemia. Results: Consistent Doppler flow waveforms were obtainable by Doppler TEE in 34 different measurements during perturbations:TEE Flow (ml/min) EMF or EDF Flow (ml/min)Mean 85 53 Standard Deviation 45 38 Minimum 42 11 Maximum 174 130TEE Flow (ml/min) = 1.1 EMF/EDF flow + 26.3. There was a general trend towards overestimation of CBF by Doppler TEE. This study demonstrates that Doppler TEE is a promising method for obtaining measurements of CBF over the physiologic range.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here