Premium
Relationship between tick bites and the seroprevalence of Babesia microti and Anaplasma phagocytophila (previously Ehrlichia sp.) in blood donors
Author(s) -
Leiby David A.,
Chung Amy P.S.,
Cable Ritchard G.,
TrouernTrend Jonathan,
McCullough Jeffrey,
Homer Mary J.,
Reynolds Lisa D.,
Houghton Raymond L.,
Lodes Michael J.,
Persing David H.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00251.x
Subject(s) - ehrlichia , ehrlichiosis , virology , babesia , anaplasma , seroprevalence , tick borne disease , tick , anaplasma phagocytophilum , anaplasmosis , biology , medicine , immunology , antibody , serology , borrelia burgdorferi
BACKGROUND : Tick‐borne diseases, particularly babesiosis and ehrlichiosis, represent recently emerging infections. Despite an increased recognition of the threat tick‐borne agents pose to blood safety, our understanding of the prevalence and transmissibility of these agents in blood donors is limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:Babesia microtiandAnaplasma phagocytophila(previouslyEhrlichia sp.) seroprevalence was determined in random Connecticut and Wisconsin donors, and subsequently in Connecticut donors reporting tick bites. In the interim, a postcard survey regarding tick bites during the previous 6 months was sent to 6000 random donors in six geographically distinct collection regions. RESULTS: In total, 3 of 999 Wisconsin donors (0.3%) and 6 of 1007 Connecticut donors (0.6%) had antibodies toB. microti.Of 992 donors tested forA. phagocytophila,5 Wisconsin donors (0.5%) and 35 Connecticut donors (3.5%) were seropositive. A total of 2482 donors (41.4%) completed the survey; 103 (4.1%) reported a tick bite. Of 848 Connecticut donors (0.4%) reporting tick bites, 3 hadB. microtiantibodies, while 8 (0.9%) hadA. phagocytophila antibodies. These rates were not significantly different from control donors. CONCLUSION: Blood donors seropositive forB. microtiandA. phagocytophila are present in Connecticut and Wisconsin. Donors readily recall previous tick bites, but self‐reported bites are not reliable indicators of serologic status. The exposure of blood donors to tick‐borne pathogens does suggest a need to better understand the transfusion transmission potential of these agents.