Premium
Economic consequences of alterations in platelet transfusion dose: analysis of a prospective, randomized, double‐blind trial
Author(s) -
Ackerman Stacey J.,
Klumpp Thomas R.,
Guzman Gladys I.,
Herman Jay H.,
Gaughan John P.,
Bleecker Giselle C.,
Mangan Kenneth F.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40121457.x
Subject(s) - medicine , economic analysis , randomized controlled trial , platelet transfusion , platelet , clinical trial , emergency medicine , prospective cohort study , intensive care medicine , surgery , agricultural economics , economics
BACKGROUND : In recent years, decreasing financial resources led to the use of lower‐dose platelet components. However, the economic consequences of the use of such components have not been carefully studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A formal economic analysis was conducted of a recently reported, prospective, randomized, double‐blind study examining the platelet dose–response relationship in nonrefractory patients. The economic analysis used a decision analysis model, conducted from the hospital's perspective and based directly on the observed clinical data and on institutional cost structures. RESULTS : The decision analysis model estimated that a 38‐percent reduction in mean platelet dose, within the commonly prescribed dose range, would result in the average patient's requiring approximately 60 percent more transfusions in the posttransplant period (8 vs. 5; p = 0.05), which would result in an estimated 60‐percent increase in the median cost to the hospital ($4486/patient vs. $2804/patient [in 1996 US dollars], p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Efforts to decrease costs by utilizing lower‐dose single‐donor platelet transfusions are predicted to result in a disproportionate increase in the number of transfusions per patient, with a corresponding increase in overall hospital transfusion costs.