z-logo
Premium
Comparison of plateletpheresis using two cell separators and identical donors
Author(s) -
Bertholf M. F.,
Mintz P. D.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1989.29689318451.x
Subject(s) - plateletpheresis , medicine , blood product , apheresis , yield (engineering) , volunteer , nuclear medicine , radiochemistry , nuclear chemistry , chemistry , surgery , platelet , materials science , agronomy , metallurgy , biology
For prospective comparison of product yield and volume, collection efficiency, white cell (WBC) and red cell (RBC) contamination, donor acceptability, and staff acceptance, each of 31 donors underwent plateletpheresis on two different cell separators (the Fenwal CS‐3000 and the COBE Spectra). The same operator performed the paired procedures and collected all study data. The instruments provided equivalent high‐yield platelet products (CS‐3000: 5.3 × 10 11 ; Spectra: 5.7 × 10 11 ). Platelet collection efficiency was greater with the Spectra (81%) than with the CS‐3000 (57%) (p<0.0005). All products contained less than 1 mL of RBCs, but the Spectra products were more likely to contain <10 6 WBCs (14/31) than those of the CS‐3000 (1/31) (p<0.001). In the remaining products, the mean WBC contamination was 1.0 × 10 8 for the CS‐3000 and 0.03 × 10 8 for the Spectra (p<0.001). More ACD‐A anticoagulant was infused with Spectra (463 mL) than with CS‐3000 procedures (400 mL) (p = 0.002). Although postdonation ionized calcium (Ca 2+ ) levels and the percentage of decrease in Ca 2+ were not significantly different between groups, more Spectra donors experienced symptoms of hypocalcemia (20/31 vs 9/31; p = 0.015). CS‐3000 products had lower mean volumes (217 mL) than Spectra collections (300 mL) (p<0.0005). Both instruments were accepted well by volunteer donors and the technical staff.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here