Premium
Evidence that Wra and Wrb are antithetical
Author(s) -
Wren M.R,
Issitt P.D
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1988.28288179012.x
Subject(s) - red cell , biochemistry , chemistry , liposome , erythrocyte membrane , red blood cell , biology , membrane , microbiology and biotechnology , computer science , artificial intelligence
Studies on 24 Wr(a+b+) and 23 Wr(a−b+) blood samples, using anti‐Wrb in the enzyme‐linked antiglobulin test (ELAT), have shown that Wr(a+b+) red cells bind, on average, a little over half the amount of anti‐Wrb bound by Wr(a−b+) red cells. Similarly, ELAT studies using six different anti‐Wra and 10 Wr(a+b+) samples, as well as red cells from the original Wr(a+b−) proposita, have shown that Wr(a+b+) red cells bind about half the amount of anti‐Wra bound by Wr(a+b−) red cells. Various pitfalls that can arise when the ELAT is used to measure antigen ratios on red cells have been avoided but are described. This conclusive evidence that Wra and Wrb have an antithetical relationship is discussed in light of the knowledge that a ficin‐resistant portion of MN sialoglycoprotein (SGP), when carried in liposomes, can inhibit anti‐Wrb. It is possible that Wra, Wrb, or both may encode a post‐ translational change in MN SGP, or production of transferases that glycosylate membrane lipids that affect in situ orientation of MN SGP, or production of protein band 3 that then forms a complex with MN SGP at the red cell membrane surface.