Premium
The Evaluation of a Positive Direct Antiglobulin Test in Pretransfusion Testing
Author(s) -
Judd W. J.,
Butch S. H.,
Oberman H. A.,
Steiner E. A.,
Bauer R. C.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
transfusion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.045
H-Index - 132
eISSN - 1537-2995
pISSN - 0041-1132
DOI - 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1980.20180125036.x
Subject(s) - medicine , antibody , coombs test , autoantibody , serology , blood transfusion , immunology , autoimmune hemolytic anemia , anemia , hemolysis , hemolytic anemia , isoantibodies
The results of serologic studies on 879 blood samples with a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) are presented. All blood samples were from patients who were either anemic, for reasons other than blood loss, recently transfused, or had serum antibodies detected during routine pretransfusion tests. Blood samples from only 81 of the patients included in this study had serologically reactive eluates (64 autoantibodies, three antibodies to penicillin and cephalothin treated red blood cells, three passively acquired anti‐A antibodies, and 11 transfusion‐induced alloantibodies). The eluted antibodies were also detected in the serum by routine pretransfusion tests in 13 of the patients whose red blood cells eluted autoantibodies, and in five of the patients whose red blood cells eluted transfusion‐induced alloantibodies. All but one of the 11 transfusion‐induced alloantibodies were detected within 14 days posttransfusion. Based on these findings, a cost‐effective and safe approach to the management of blood samples with a positive DAT would be to restrict the preparation and testing of eluates to those samples from recently transfused patients. It is the contention of the authors that the incorporation of the DAT in pretransfusion testing should primarily serve to detect alloantibody formation before such antibodies are evident in the serum, and should not be used to screen patients for unsuspected autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Furthermore, the authors question the necessity for blood banks to routinely perform an autocontrol on all blood samples from prospective transfusion recipients.