Premium
Exercise Training for Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention of Falls in Geriatric Patients with a History of Injurious Falls
Author(s) -
Hauer Klaus,
Rost Brenda,
Rütschle Kirstin,
Opitz Hedda,
Specht Norbert,
Bärtsch Peter,
Oster Peter,
Schlierf Günter
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of the american geriatrics society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.992
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 1532-5415
pISSN - 0002-8614
DOI - 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49004.x
Subject(s) - medicine , physical therapy , rehabilitation , balance (ability) , ambulatory , randomized controlled trial , geriatrics , intervention (counseling) , activities of daily living , poison control , surgery , emergency medicine , psychiatry
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of an exercise protocol designed to improve strength, mobility, and balance and to reduce subsequent falls in geriatric patients with a history of injurious falls. DESIGN: A randomized controlled 3‐month intervention trial, with an additional 3‐month follow‐up. SETTING: Out‐patient geriatric rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty‐seven female geriatric patients (mean age 82 ± 4.8 years; range 75–90) admitted to acute care or inpatient rehabilitation with a history of recurrent or injurious falls including patients with acute fall‐related fracture. INTERVENTION: Ambulatory training of strength, functional performance, and balance 3 times per week for 3 months. Patients of the control group attended a placebo group 3 times a week for 3 months. Both groups received an identical physiotherapeutic treatment 2 times a week, in which strengthening and balance training were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: Strength, functional ability, motor function, psychological parameters, and fall rates were assessed by standardized protocols at the beginning (T1) and the end (T2) of intervention. Patients were followed up for 3 months after the intervention (T3). RESULTS: No training‐related medical problems occurred in the study group. Forty‐five patients (79%) completed all assessments after the intervention and follow‐up period. Adherence was excellent in both groups (intervention 85.4 ± 27.8% vs control 84.2 ± 29.3%). The patients in the intervention group increased strength, functional motor performance, and balance significantly. Fall‐related behavioral and emotional restrictions were reduced significantly. Improvements persisted during the 3‐month follow‐up with only moderate losses. For patients of the control group, no change in strength, functional performance, or emotional status could be documented during intervention and follow‐up. Fall incidence was reduced nonsignificantly by 25% in the intervention group compared with the control group (RR:0.753 CI:0.455–1.245). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive resistance training and progressive functional training are safe and effective methods of increasing strength and functional performance and reducing fall‐related behavioral and emotional restrictions during ambulant rehabilitation in frail, high‐risk geriatric patients with a history of injurious falls.