z-logo
Premium
Systematics of Coccoid Green Algae: Morphology vs. 18S rRNA Gene Phylogeny
Author(s) -
Krienitz L.,
Wolf M.,
Hegewald E.,
Hepperle D.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of phycology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.85
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1529-8817
pISSN - 0022-3646
DOI - 10.1046/j.1529-8817.38.s1.57.x
Subject(s) - biology , botany , systematics , algae , phylogenetic tree , green algae , phylogenetics , taxon , 18s ribosomal rna , plastid , taxonomy (biology) , gene , genetics , chloroplast
Abstract Classical approaches using morphological characters for the circumscription of taxa in coccoid green algae do not adequately reflect the phylogenetic relationships. Phylogenetic trees based on 18S rRNA gene sequence analysis provide new insights into the systematics of these algae. We give a review and discuss the content of orders of coccoid green algae and evaluate the usefulness of some traditionally used diacritic features. Whereas the content of the orders Chlorococcales and Chlorellales needs to be reduced, the order Sphaeropleales comprises more families than in the traditional circumscription. According to molecular biological investigations the Neochloridaceae, Selenastraceae and Scenedesmaceae formerly classified in the Chlorococcales and later into the Chlorellales belong to the Sphaeropleales. The Hydrodictyaceae, formerly a member of the Protosiphonales, are also to be grouped in the Sphaeropleales. Some members of the Ulotrichales, which propagate by binary fission (e.g. Nannochloris and Catena ) cluster together with autosporine coccoid taxa within the Trebouxiophyceae. With the example of members of the Selenastraceae, Oocystaceae and Chlorellacea it is shown that the morphology of cells as well as the formation of coenobia, spines, mucilage and incrustations cannot be used to separate genera.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here