Premium
A REEXAMINATION OF THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE ACROCHAETIALES (RHODOPHYTA) USING LARGE‐SUBUNIT RDNA SEQUENCE DATA
Author(s) -
Harper J.T.,
Saunders G.W.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of phycology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.85
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1529-8817
pISSN - 0022-3646
DOI - 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.00001-85.x
Subject(s) - biology , polyphyly , systematics , lineage (genetic) , phylogenetic tree , evolutionary biology , taxon , maximum parsimony , phylogenetics , molecular phylogenetics , zoology , taxonomy (biology) , genetics , paleontology , gene , clade
The taxonomic history of the red algal order Acrochaetiales is chaotic. There is no consensus in the literature as to how many genera should be recognized or in the assignment of the over 400 species to these genera. Morphological and anatomical studies have provided a suite of possible characters to delineate genera within this order, but there have been major discrepancies in the assessment and use of these features. The phylogenetic placement of the Acrochaetiales has also been the focus of debate. Once thought to be the most ancestral florideophyte lineage, recent molecular systematic studies have illustrated that this order is a derived lineage closely related to the Nemaliales and Palmariales. Phylogenies using sequences of the small‐subunit (SSU) rDNA have strongly supported two very divergent lineages within a possibly polyphyletic Acrochaetiales. The relationships between these two groups and among other closely related rhodophyte orders were not resolved. We have generated large‐subunit (LSU) rDNA sequence data for representatives of the Acrochaetiales and related taxa. Distance and parsimony phylogenies based on LSU and combined SSU and LSU data will be presented. The increased phylogenetic signal afforded by this approach will shed light on previous conundrums in the systematics of this group.