Dilatation and Declotting of Arteriovenous Accesses

  The autogenous arteriovenous fistula has long been proven to be the most durable access for hemodialysis and therefore for any therapy based on plasma exchange. Forearm autogenous fistulas are, however, frequently challenging to create, leading less experienced surgeons to create elbow fistulas or even worse, to place prosthetic grafts. Once the arteriovenous access is constructed, stenoses largely located on the venous side frequently occur, leading to thrombosis if they are not detected and preventively treated. Interventional radiology is now the first line and preferred treatment in the majority of cases of vascular access dysfunction. The overall advantages compared with conventional surgery are its minimal invasiveness, better preservation of the patient's venous reserve, and better outcomes for selected indications such as thrombosed autogenous fistulas. Prophylactic dilation of stenoses greater than 50% associated with clinical abnormalities such as flow‐rate reduction is warranted to prolong access patency. Stents are placed only in selected cases with clearly insufficient results of dilation but they must never overlap major side veins and obviate future access creation. Thrombosed fistulas and grafts can be declotted by purely mechanical methods or in combination with a lytic drug. The success rates are over 90% for dilation, in central veins radiologists frequently resort to the use of stents. Long‐term results after dilation in the largest series are better in forearm native fistulas compared with grafts. The initial success rates for declotting are better in grafts compared with forearm fistulas but early rethrombosis is frequent in grafts so that primary patency rates can be better for native fistulas from the first month's follow‐up.