Premium
Low‐Density Lipoprotein Apheresis: Clinical Results with Different Methods
Author(s) -
Bambauer Rolf
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
artificial organs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1525-1594
pISSN - 0160-564X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06837.x
Subject(s) - apheresis , ldl apheresis , familial hypercholesterolemia , immunoadsorption , medicine , triglyceride , lipoprotein , cholesterol , plasmapheresis , low density lipoprotein , total cholesterol , gastroenterology , immunology , antibody , platelet
In 40 patients (22 women, 18 men) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid lowering drugs, low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis was performed over 84.9 ± 43.2 months. Four different systems (Liposorber, 28 of 40, Kaneka, Osaka, Japan; Therasorb, 6 of 40, Baxter, Munich, Germany; Lipopak, 2 of 40, Pocard, Moscow, Russia; and Dali, 4 of 40, Fresenius, St. Wendel, Germany) were used. With all methods, average reductions of 50.6% for total cholesterol, 52.2% for LDL, 64.3% for lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]), and 43.1% for triglycerides, and an average increase of 10.3% for high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) were reached. Severe side effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.5%) in all methods. In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well being and increased performance were experienced by 39 of 40 patients. Assessing the different apheresis systems used, at the end of the trial, there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome experienced with the patients' total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglyceride concentrations. However, to reduce high Lp(a) levels, the immunoadsorption method with special Lp(a) columns (Lipopak) seems to be most effective: −59% versus –25% (Kaneka) – (Baxter), and –29% (Dali). The present data demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to maximum conservative therapy is very effective and safe even in long‐term application.