Premium
Coevolution in bicoid ‐dependent promoters and the inception of regulatory incompatibilities among species of higher Diptera
Author(s) -
Shaw P. J.,
Wratten N. S.,
McGregor A. P.,
Dover G. A.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
evolution and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.651
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1525-142X
pISSN - 1520-541X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.02016.x
Subject(s) - drosophila embryogenesis , biology , homeobox , evolutionary biology , genetics , promoter , gene , coevolution , drosophila melanogaster , transcription factor , gene expression
SUMMARY To what extent and in what way do gene promoters and their transacting regulatory proteins coevolve? In this and in earlier publications we show that the Bicoid‐dependent promoters of the segmentation genes hunchback and tailless in species of higher Diptera ( Drosophila , Musca , Calliphora , and Lucilia ) are different with respect to the copy number, spacing, sequence, and orientation of Bicoid binding sites. At the same time there are significant amino acid differences in the Bicoid homeodomain. To test these interspecific differences, we used a series of functional assays, starting with the analysis of Bicoid binding affinities of individual sites, through to transgene rescue experiments, to compare within‐species with between‐species mixtures of Bicoid homeo‐ domains and hunchback or tailless promoters. We observed that components taken from different species interact with less efficiency compared with those taken from within the same species. Our interpretation is that such interspecific incompatibilities are a consequence of interactive genetic elements coevolving one with another, hence maintaining functional compatibility within each species. At the same time such a process allows differences to accumulate between species regarding the precise molecular basis whereby the common function is effected.