z-logo
Premium
Is It Acceptable to Let a Species Go Extinct in a National Park?
Author(s) -
Berger Joel
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02467.x
Subject(s) - citation , wildlife , national park , library science , geography , environmental ethics , genealogy , political science , history , ecology , archaeology , computer science , biology , philosophy
I once was asked whether it was okay to allow a species to go extinct in a national park. My gut response was no, but I had not thought about the question seriously: whose park and where, and would the extinction have direct or indirect effects on the ecological community? Perhaps I might have couched a reply by suggesting that it was okay for some species to go extinct in some parks but not in others. Whether a single unanimous response fits all possibilities is unclear. Here I address the question by suggesting how preemptive measures might be used to forestall species losses, and I follow up with a real-world case of how an imminent loss can be circumvented. This latter point is highly relevant because it concerns not only the looming extirpation of a species from a national park but also an ecological process of national and international importance: the longest overland mammal migration across the vastness between Tierra del Fuego and Toronto.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here