Premium
Variación Espacial de la Diversidad y Composición de Especies de Lepidópteros en Bosques Deciduos Orientales de Norte América
Author(s) -
Summerville Keith S.,
Boulware Michael J.,
Veech Joseph A.,
Crist Thomas O.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02059.x
Subject(s) - species richness , biodiversity , ecology , dominance (genetics) , geography , habitat , abundance (ecology) , species diversity , deciduous , gamma diversity , lepidoptera genitalia , spatial ecology , biology , beta diversity , biochemistry , gene
The primary emphasis of conservation biology has moved away from attempting to manage single species within a given habitat to the preservation of entire communities within ecoregions, requiring that greater attention be paid to how biodiversity and species composition vary across spatial scales. Using a nested sampling design, we examined spatial variation in the biodiversity of forest Lepidoptera across three hierarchical levels: 20 forest stands, five sites, and three ecoregions. We used blacklight traps to sample the moth communities of each forest stand every week in June and August of 2000. Lepidopteran community composition was most significantly influenced by ecoregional differences, whereas patterns of α and β diversity across scales differed depending on how diversity was measured. Diversity partitioning models demonstrated that turnover in species richness occurred equally across all spatial scales because numerically rare species were continually encountered. In contrast, within‐stand effects disproportionately influenced Simpson and Shannon diversity ( relative to outcomes from randomization tests ), suggesting that local factors determined species dominance. Because most Lepidoptera in forests appear to be rare ( >50% ), it will be impossible for conservation biologists to design management plans to account for every species. We suggest that a more meaningful strategy would be to identify species that attain a reasonable abundance within a community ( 5–10% of all the individuals in a sample ) and that are unique to particular spatial levels. This strategy should produce two desirable outcomes: the conservation of species that render ecoregions distinct and the maintenance of functionally dominant species within forests.