z-logo
Premium
Managing Stand Structure as Part of Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management in Australian Mountain Ash Forests
Author(s) -
Lindenmayer David B.,
Franklin Jerry F.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96150.x
Subject(s) - biodiversity , temperate rainforest , forest management , clearcutting , agroforestry , sustainable forest management , forest ecology , temperate forest , wood production , habitat , geography , environmental resource management , ecology , ecosystem , environmental science , forestry , biology
Ecologically sustainable management of temperate forests is a complex task that involves balancing potentially conflicting land uses such as wood production and nature conservation. We argue that a variety of strategies implemented at different spatial scales is required for biodiversity conservation in temperate forests where wood production is permitted. This is a form of “risk‐spreading;” if one option is ineffective for a given species, it may still be conserved as a result of the implementation of other approaches. At the largest scale, there is a clear need for reserves to protect representative samples of forest ecosystems. Within landscapes broadly designated for timber harvesting, intermediate‐scale strategies such as the implementation of networks of streamside reserves and wildlife corridors are important for biodiversity conservation. At smaller spatial scales within harvested areas, critical habitat components for forest‐dependent organisms like large old trees and logs must be provided. We focus on the importance of these fine‐scale attributes for the conservation of biodiversity within logged forests using the mountain ash (  Eucalyptus regnans) forests of the Central Highlands of Victoria as a case study. Forest managers must develop silvicultural practices that maintain and perpetuate critical stand attributes essential for the conservation of forest‐dependent organisms. To this end, a shift is required from the extensive use of clearfelling to the adoption of new silvicultural techniques that maintain more structurally complex multi‐aged stands. The maintenance of key structural features should be used as a template to guide harvesting methods to ensure that production forests contribute to biodiversity conservation, not only in mountain ash forests, but also temperate wood production elsewhere around the world.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here