Premium
Simulación de la respuesta de poblaciones de pájaros del interior de forestas a opciones en el manejo de forestas en bosques de maderas duras del centro de los Estados Unidos.
Author(s) -
Thompson Frank R.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
conservation biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.2
H-Index - 222
eISSN - 1523-1739
pISSN - 0888-8892
DOI - 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07020325.x
Subject(s) - clearcutting , fecundity , population , forest management , selection (genetic algorithm) , ecology , geography , habitat , population model , forestry , demography , biology , computer science , artificial intelligence , sociology
I used estimates of carrying capacity, survival, fecundity, and edge effects to simulate the responses of a forest‐interior bird population to selection cutting clearcutting, and no timber harvest. I also modeled population sensitivity to changes in fecundity, survival, K , and edge relationships. Because model parameters are based on scant data, results should he regarded as hypotheses to be further investigated or measures of the relative impact or sensitivity (given model assumptions). Simulated population size was greater with no timber harvest than with clearcutting and greater with clearcutting than with group selection when edge effects were included in the model. Without edge effects, population levels were only slightly lower under group selection than under no timber harvest, and greater than clearcutting. Edge effects had only a small impact on population levels under clearcutting. Clearcut size did not have much effect on population levels, but longer and shorter rotation ages resulted in higher and lower population levels, respectively. The model was very sensitive to declines in mean fecundity and survival, suggesting that factors affecting mean demographic rates could be more important than local edge effects. Some methods of timber harvest may be compatible with the conservation of forest‐interior birds, but better demographic data and information on habitat suitability of selectively cut forests and young even‐aged stands is needed to adequately evaluate management options.