Premium
Choice Reaction Time and Adequacy of Dialysis: A New Application of an Old Method
Author(s) -
Ahmad Suhail
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
hemodialysis international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.658
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1542-4758
pISSN - 1492-7535
DOI - 10.1046/j.1492-7535.2003.00020.x
Subject(s) - medicine , hemodialysis , dialysis , peritoneal dialysis , creatinine , renal function , urology , kidney disease , end stage renal disease , surgery
Background: Choice Reaction Time (CRT) is the time it takes for a subject to accurately respond to a flashing panel of lights. The CRT has been used to assess the quality of dialysis in hemodialysis patients and to assess the neurological impairments in patients with Parkinson's disease. Methods: Three groups of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on three different renal replacement therapies were tested using CRT: intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD, n = 11), thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD, n = 22), and well‐functioning kidney transplant (Tx, n = 6). A group of volunteers with normal renal function (NL, n = 12) was also tested. Results: The CRT was significantly longer in IPD patients (618 ± 89 ms) than observed in the other three groups (p < 0.0001). CRT in HD patients was 461 ± 50 ms, which was significantly longer than in Tx patients (396 ± 25 ms, p = 0.05). However, the CRT in the Tx patients was no different from the NL (382 ± 22, p = 0.32). There was a strong negative correlation between CRT and weekly creatinine clearance in the IPD group (r =− .96) and between the dialysis index and CRT in HD (r =− 0.79). Conclusions: CRT may be a useful tool in assessing the adequacy of dialysis.