Premium
Relationship between goblet cell density and tear function tests
Author(s) -
Yeo Anna Chwee Hong,
Carkeet Andrew,
Carney Leo G.,
Yap Maurice Keng Hung
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
ophthalmic and physiological optics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.147
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1475-1313
pISSN - 0275-5408
DOI - 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00092.x
Subject(s) - ophthalmology , contact lens , magnification , goblet cell , conjunctiva , cytology , medicine , spearman's rank correlation coefficient , mathematics , pathology , epithelium , optics , physics , statistics
Aim: The objective of this study was to find a relationship between goblet cell density (GCD) and other diagnostic tests of dry eye in a group of normal healthy Chinese subjects. The capability of using GCD as a tear function test was assessed. Method: A total of 42 optometry students with no contact lens wear history were recruited. Subjects were required to fill in a dry eye questionnaire. The non‐invasive tear break‐up time (NITBUT) of each subject was measured, followed by phenol red thread test (PRTT) and tear break‐up time (TBUT) tests. Conjunctival epithelial cells from the inferior nasal bulbar conjunctiva were harvested by the impression cytology technique. The specimens collected were labelled and stained with PAS (Periodic Acid Schiff)‐haematoxylin. The goblet cells and the conjunctival epithelial cells were counted under a light microscope of 100× magnification. Spearman's rho ( ρ ) correlation test was used to analyse the relationship between GCD and the other tear function tests. Results: With a probability level of 0.0051 (corrected for a cumulative familywise error rate of p = 0.05), GCD was found to have no correlation with NITBUT ( ρ = −0.193, p = 0.222), McMonnies Dry Eye Scores (MCDES) ( ρ = −0.052, p = 0.742), PRTT ( ρ = − 0.188, p = 0.234) and TBUT ( ρ = 0.246, p = 0.117). Conclusion: There was no correlation between GCD and MCDES, NITBUT, PRTT and TBUT. The GCD alone is not a useful diagnostic test for tear film instability in normal eyes although it is a good indicator in the diagnosis of ocular surface diseases.