Premium
Decreased actin solubility observed during ATP‐depletion is mimicked by severing agents but not depolymerizing agents in isolated and cultured proximal tubular cells
Author(s) -
White Peter,
Gu Luo,
Chen Jing
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
clinical physiology and functional imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1475-097X
pISSN - 1475-0961
DOI - 10.1046/j.1475-097x.2002.00437.x
Subject(s) - actin , cytoskeleton , actin cytoskeleton , microbiology and biotechnology , microfilament , actin remodeling , actin remodeling of neurons , adenosine triphosphate , biophysics , biology , biochemistry , cell
Summary The microvilli of the apical membrane of proximal tubule (PT) cells are supported by the underlying actin cytoskeleton. Ischaemic or anoxic ATP‐depletion leads to the disruption of the actin cytoskeleton, resulting in microvillar retraction and loss of membrane polarity. Using isolated PT cells, we have previously demonstrated that actin filaments (F‐actin) are likely severed during ATP‐depletion. A sequential extraction protocol revealed a decrease in actin solubility, resulting in the sequestration of a distinct F‐actin pool with the insoluble cellular complex in ATP‐depleted PT cells. We demonstrate here that decreased actin solubility is not only a reliable end‐marker of ATP‐depletion induced injury in freshly isolated PT cells, but also serves as a biochemical marker in the cultured proximal tubular cell line LLC‐PK1. In the present studies, we also investigated specific actin‐binding drugs to determine if they mimic the effects observed during energy depletion. Jasplakinolide (JP), a compound which binds F‐actin and prevents depolymerization, did not effect actin solubility during ATP‐depletion. Furthermore, swinholide A (SA), an F‐actin severing agent, resulted in decreased actin solubility, mimicking the effects of ATP‐depletion. Interestingly, latrunculin A (LA), an agent which depolymerizes F‐actin, did not reduce actin solubiltity, but rather resulted in an increase in digitonin‐soluble actin. Taken collectively, our results support previous work and suggest that disruption of the actin cytoskeleton during ATP‐depletion is mediated by F‐actin severing/fragmentation and not depolymerization. The differential effects of F‐actin disrupting agents and the consistencies observed in both models of ischaemic injury will provide a basis for a more detailed understanding of the pathological events of PT‐cell dysfunction.