Premium
Does supplementary calcium reduce the cost of reproduction in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca ?
Author(s) -
Mänd Raivo,
Tilgar Vallo
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
ibis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.933
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1474-919X
pISSN - 0019-1019
DOI - 10.1046/j.1474-919x.2003.00123.x
Subject(s) - ficedula , reproduction , biology , insectivore , parus , ecology , zoology , population , flycatcher , habitat , demography , sociology
Studies in acidified as well as in naturally base‐poor areas have recently revealed that availability of extra calcium‐rich food items is an important component of habitat quality affecting breeding performance in several bird species. However, these mostly short‐term studies have provided equivocal results concerning the exact consequences of calcium shortage on different species in different regions. We studied the effect of calcium availability on reproduction of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca breeding in pine forests in Estonia, NE Europe, over a period of 4 years. Experimental pairs were provided with supplementary calcium‐rich material when breeding, while control pairs were left unsupplemented. Experimental females laid larger eggs and their nestlings had longer tarsi than those of controls. Moreover, the mass and condition of females tending larger than average clutches were increased by calcium‐supplementation. Our results provide the first experimental evidence that calcium availability may affect the overall cost of reproduction in free‐living passerines. We compared these results with similar data for the Great Tit Parus major , collected from the same area during the same study period. Great Tits responded to low calcium availability mainly by restrained reproductive behaviour and reduced breeding success, while Pied Flycatchers invested significantly more in current reproductive effort despite the increased cost of reproduction. Thus, the effects of calcium deficiency on birds seem to be species‐specific or population‐specific. This partly explains discrepancies between the results of earlier studies.