z-logo
Premium
Phosphorus allocation and utilization in three grass species with contrasting response to N and P supply
Author(s) -
RYSER PETER,
VERDUYN BETTY,
LAMBERS HANS
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
new phytologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.742
H-Index - 244
eISSN - 1469-8137
pISSN - 0028-646X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00807.x
Subject(s) - dactylis glomerata , biology , productivity , phosphorus , interspecific competition , nutrient , biomass (ecology) , agronomy , botany , festuca rubra , zoology , poaceae , chemistry , ecology , organic chemistry , economics , macroeconomics
summary The growth of the grass Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv. in Dutch nutrient‐poor chalk grasslands increases with enhanced nitrogen supply, whereas other grass species also require an enhanced phosphorus supply for a similar response (e.g. Dactylis glomerata L.), or are competitively suppressed at any increase in nutrient supply (e.g. Briza media L.). We investigated whether this interspecific variation in response to N and P supply is caused by differences in P productivity (PP), i.e. the instantaneous rate of biomass production per unit of P present in the plant. We hypothesized that PP is highest in Brachypodium pinnatum , in contrast to N productivity which is known to be the highest in Dactylis glomerata. Phosphorus productivity and its components were studied using a growth analysis with four exponential P addition rates of 0.03, 0.06, 009 and 0.11/0.15 mg P mg −1 P d −1 . Although Brachypodium pinnatum allocated more P to its leaf blades, it had a lower P productivity at high N and low P supply than did Dactylis glomerata. This was associated with a higher productivity per unit leaf P in Dactylis glomerata. Across all species and treatments, leaf PP showed a distinct negative correlation with P concentration per leaf area, regardless whether the variation in area‐based leaf P concentration was caused by variation in leaf thickness, leaf tissue mass density or mass‐based P concentration. A possible explanation for this would be a positive correlation between leaf chlorophyll concentration and P concentration, leading at high concentrations to shading within the leaf and to a low photosynthetic rate per unit leaf P. We conclude that a high pp is determined by the ability of a plant to distribute its P over a large leaf area, rather than by greater allocation of P to the leaves. Interspecific relationships for P productivity are similar to those known for N productivity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here