Premium
Fetal weight estimation by three‐dimensional ultrasound
Author(s) -
Schild R. L.,
Fimmers R.,
Hansmann M.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00249.x
Subject(s) - medicine , fetus , abdomen , ultrasound , thigh , fetal weight , nuclear medicine , birth weight , standard error , 3d ultrasound , upper abdomen , pregnancy , obstetrics , surgery , radiology , mathematics , statistics , genetics , biology
Objective To assess the value of three‐dimensional volume scanning in predicting fetal weight at birth. Study design Prospective cross‐sectional study within 7 days of delivery. A total of 190 patients were considered for final analysis (formula‐finding group: n = 125, formula evaluation group: n = 65). Inclusion criteria were a singleton pregnancy and absence of chromosomal or significant structural anomalies. Three‐dimensional (3D) volumetric measurements of the fetal thigh, upper arm and abdomen were performed together with conventional two‐dimensional (2D) biometry. Results All measurements were completed successfully in each patient. Polynomial regression analysis with standard biometric parameters and volumes of the upper arm, the thigh and the abdomen was employed to yield the best‐fit formula for prediction of fetal weight at birth. The new 3D formula (estimated fetal weight (EFW) = −1478.557 + 7.242 × thigh volume + 13.309 × upper arm volume + 852.998 × log 10 abdominal volume + 0.526 × BPD 3 ) proved to be superior to established 2D equations with the lowest mean error (25.8 ± 194.4 g), the lowest mean absolute error (155.2 ± 118.2 g) and the lowest mean absolute percentage error (6.1 ± 5.0%) when studied prospectively in the evaluation group. Conclusion 3D sonography allows superior fetal weight estimation by including soft tissue volume. Further studies at the extremes of fetal weight are needed to confirm the value of our formula in these subsets. Copyright © 2000 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology