Premium
Intraobserver reproducibility of transvaginal Doppler measurements in uterine and intraovarian arteries in regularly menstruating women
Author(s) -
Tekay A.,
Jouppila P.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07020129.x
Subject(s) - medicine , reproducibility , doppler effect , coefficient of variation , ultrasound , artery , doppler ultrasound , beat (acoustics) , laser doppler velocimetry , blood flow , cardiology , mathematics , radiology , physics , optics , statistics , astronomy
The intraobserver reproducibility of the pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI) and maximum peak systolic velocity (MPSV) measurements in uterine and intraovarian arteries was assessed in ten regularly menstruating women by means of transvaginal pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Three different sources of variation in repeat measurements, i.e. beat‐to‐beat, between‐frame and temporal variability, were studied using the coefficient of variation (CV) and intra‐class correlation coefficients. Beat‐to‐beat and between‐frame variabilities in all Doppler parameters were negligible. The following figures were obtained from the assessment of temporal variability. The uterine artery PI and MPSV measurements had a CV of 10% and 15%, respectively. Intra‐class correlation coefficients for these parameters were 0.99 and 0.88, respectively. In the intraovarian arteries, the CV was between 15 and 19% for the PI and between 8 and 12% for the RI. The CV values for intraovarian MPSV measurements were 14 and 16%. In contrast, the intra‐class correlation coefficients for the intraovarian MPSV measurements showed considerable variation, from 0.63 to 0.68. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry proved to be a reliable method. The PI and RI measurements in the intraovarian arteries were also reproducible. In contrast, the inconsistency observed in velocity measurements in the intraovarian arteries raises some doubt as to the reliability of these measurements. Copyright © 1996 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology