Premium
Gentlemanly capitalism in New Zealand
Author(s) -
Hopkins A. G.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
australian economic history review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.493
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 1467-8446
pISSN - 0004-8992
DOI - 10.1046/j.1467-8446.2003.00055.x
Subject(s) - capitalism , argument (complex analysis) , interpretation (philosophy) , subject (documents) , empire , sociology , political science , law , political economy , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , library science , politics , computer science
This article responds to McAloon's contribution to this journal criticising the argument advanced by P.J. Cain and myself in British Imperialism . McAloon's research on Canterbury and Otago merits serious attention, but it is argued here that he is mistaken in claiming that it disproves the case we made for applying our concept of gentlemanly capitalism to New Zealand. Both the structure of ‘settler capitalism’ and the social characteristics of the settlers themselves provide a good fit with our interpretation. Nevertheless, McAloon deserves credit for putting this subject on the agenda, and it is to be hoped that other historians of New Zealand (and also of Australia) will now reconsider the relationship between the ‘rules of the game’ established by the imperial centre and the degrees of dependence experienced by the constituent parts of the empire.