z-logo
Premium
The cloacal plate: the missing link in anorectal and urogenital development
Author(s) -
Penington E.C.,
Hutson J.M.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02655.x
Subject(s) - anatomy , cloaca , biology , embryology , hindgut , genitourinary system , sex organ , dissection (medical) , larva , botany , genetics , midgut
Objective  To determine whether differences in the embryology of the anorectal and urogenital area, previously examined in sheep, pigs, rats, rabbits and guinea pigs, producing varying conclusions, may be secondary to differences in species development. Materials and methods  Rat and human embryos were studied at the time of genital tubercle development and cloacal partition by standard serial‐section histology, and by immunohistochemistry, dissection and scanning electron microscopy. The images obtained were compared with those previously reported for pig and sheep embryos. Results  The cloacal plate, a vertically orientated midline plate of epithelial cells in the caudal half of the genital tubercle, was the key structure that varied between the different species. In rats the plate maintained a vertical height along its length, while in humans and pigs it reverted to a two‐layer membrane dorsally, shortly before it degenerated to expose both the anorectal and urogenital tracts. In sheep the plate was taller ventrally than in the other species but also reverted to a short membrane dorsally that exposed the hindgut when it degenerated. The anterior part of the cloacal plate persisted in all embryos as the urethral plate, which then participated in the formation of the urethra in the male and the vestibule in the female. The animal that most closely resembled humans in anogenital development was the pig. Conclusions  The cloacal plate is the key to understanding early anorectal and urogenital development and yet it is barely recognized in published reports. An appreciation of its relevance helps to explain the variations in the described embryology of the region, and is mandatory when interpreting embryological findings in animal models of human anomalies. Given the similarities between porcine and human development, the pig may be the most legitimate animal model for the study of anorectal and urogenital anomalies in humans.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here