z-logo
Premium
Magnetic resonance urography in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and spinal dysraphism
Author(s) -
Shipstone D.P.,
Thomas D.G.,
Darwent G.,
Morcos S.K.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02632.x
Subject(s) - medicine , pyelogram , ureter , magnetic resonance imaging , urinary system , urology , radiology , kappa , upper urinary tract , anatomy , linguistics , philosophy
Objective  To investigate the reliability of magnetic resonance urography (MRU) using heavily T2‐weighted very fast spin‐echo sequences in imaging the upper urinary tract in patients with spinal dysraphism and neuropathic bladder dysfunction. Patients and methods  Patients with neuropathic bladder dysfunction secondary to spinal dysraphism may have gross spinal deformity, which makes assessing the urinary tract extremely difficult by ultrasonography or intravenous urography. The study included 50 patients (median age 33 years, range 19–52) with a median (range) Cobb's angle of 60 (0–240)°. No contrast medium was given but all patients received 20 mg of intramuscular frusemide 20–30 min before MRU. Results  Thirty‐five patients had previous ultrasonography, during which only 42 kidneys and no ureters were visible. Of the 94 renal tracts, MRU visualized all kidneys and 86 (89%) ureters. There was good agreement amongst observers on assessing the kidneys and pelvicalyceal systems (kappa  0.61) but only moderate agreement on evaluating the ureters (kappa  0.61). There was disagreement on normality vs renal parenchymal scarring in 14 (15%) kidneys, about no dilatation vs dilatation of the pelvicalyceal system in 14 (15%) systems and about no dilatation vs dilatation of the ureter in 20 (22%) ureters. The overall quality of the MRU images was rated highly, with a mean (range) score of 4.6 (3–5). Conclusion  MRU provides a reliable noninvasive technique for imaging the upper tract in patients who were previously difficult to investigate.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here