Premium
Does anaesthetic technique affect the outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate?
Author(s) -
Mark Reeves,
Paul S. Myles
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00357.x
Subject(s) - medicine , transurethral resection of the prostate , general anaesthesia , anesthesia , spinal anesthesia , general anaesthetic , adverse effect , prostate , incidence (geometry) , cohort , surgery , physics , cancer , optics
Objective To determine if the choice of anaesthetic (spinal or general) has any influence on outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and methods The records of 261 patients undergoing TURP between October 1995 and July 1998 were selected for a matched‐cohort study. There were 87 complete datasets for cases performed under general anaesthesia and each was matched to two patients (174) from those undergoing spinal anaesthesia. The cohorts were matched by age, physical status score and date of operation. The primary outcome measures were length of stay in the recovery room and satisfaction with postoperative analgesia. Results There were no significant differences in major outcomes. There was a higher incidence of some minor adverse events in the group having general anaesthesia. Back pain was more common after spinal anaesthesia. Conclusion Spinal anaesthesia was not associated with an improved outcome after TURP. The choice of anaesthesia should be made by the patient, surgeon and anaesthetist on the basis of the known risks of particular adverse events.