Premium
Neurostimulation for bladder evacuation: is sacral root stimulation a substitute for microstimulation?
Author(s) -
PROBST M.,
PIECHOTA H.J.,
HOHENFELLNER M.,
GLEASON C.A.,
TANAGHO E.A.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00101.x
Subject(s) - neurostimulation , microstimulation , stimulation , sacral nerve stimulation , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery
Objective To determine by anatomical and functional studies whether stimulation of sacral rootlets might permit selective stimulation of autonomic fibres, thus avoiding the detrusor/sphincter dyssynergia characteristic of current techniques of neurostimulation for bladder evacuation. Materials and methods In 10 male mongrel dogs, the S 2 root was isolated and its constituent rootlets followed from their origin in the spinal cord to the point of exit from the dura. The entire root and the individual rootlets were then stimulated, including intra‐ and extra‐dural stimulation and at proximal, mid and distal levels. Results Neuroanatomical and histological findings showed that the rootlets of ventral S 2 maintain their identity throughout their intradural course; some carry predominantly autonomic fibres, some predominantly somatic and some a mixture of the two. Conclusion It appears surgically feasible to identify, isolate and sever the predominantly somatic rootlets intradurally, sparing the predominantly autonomic rootlets for inclusion in extradural electrode placement around the entire sacral root, thus eliminating sphincteric interference with detrusor contraction for voiding at low pressure.