Premium
A comparison of various methods to burst Foley catheter balloons and the risk of free‐fragment formation
Author(s) -
Gülmez I.,
Ekmekcioglu O.,
Karacagil M.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.98017.x
Subject(s) - fragment (logic) , foley , foley catheter , catheter , medicine , surgery , computer science , algorithm
Objective To compare the efficiencies of bursting balloons and the risks of forming free fragments after rupture using needles, the stylet of a ureteric catheter, instillation with ether or overinflation. Materials and methods Two hundred 18 F ‘silkolatex’ Foley balloon catheters were divided into four groups of 50. Each balloon was inflated with 30 mL of distilled water, the catheters immersed in urine collected from healthy volunteers and maintained at 37°C for 48 h. Attempts were made to burst the balloons with a needle (group 1), by overinflation (group 2), by ether instillation (group 3) and using the stylet of 7 F ureteric catheter through the inflation channel (group 4). Results The ratio of the burst to deflated balloons and the formation of free fragments were 100% and 0% in the group 1, 94% and 83% in the group 2, 100% and 100% in group 3 and 16% and 0% in the group 4, respectively. Conclusion Bursting the catheter balloons using a needle seems to be the most appropriate method, being efficient and having little risk of forming free fragments.