Premium
Urethroplasty for posterior urethral strictures
Author(s) -
Mundy A.R.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.11617.x
Subject(s) - urethroplasty , medicine , surgery , urethra , anastomosis , pelvic fracture , urethral stricture , pelvis
Objective To assess the long‐term results and complications of urethroplasty for patients with pelvic fracture injuries of the posterior urethra and to determine which type of of procedure is most appropriate. Patients and methods Eighty‐two patients were followed prospectively after undergoing transperineal bulbo‐prostatic anastomotic urethroplasty (AU). The results and complications in these patients were compared with 59 patients who had a ‘patch’ urethroplasty (PU) for a short stricture which in other circumstances might have been amenable to AU. Results The 1‐, 5‐ and 10‐year re‐stricture rates were 7, 12 and 12%, respectively, for AU and 12, 20 and 31% for PU. Four of the 10 patients who re‐strictured during the 5‐year follow‐up after AU were >55 years of age and four of the seven patients who had an AU and who were >55 years old re‐strictured. All the patients who restrictured were impotent. The commonest complications after AU were principally a consequence of the original injury rather than the surgery, whereas the complications after PU were principally related to the surgery. Impotence sometimes occurred after both types of urethroplasty. Conclusions Anastomotic urethroplasty is the best available procedure for traumatic proximal urethral strictures but was not tolerated well in the elderly and caused impotence in a small but significant proportion. The results of PU were less satisfactory and the difference became progressively more marked with a longer follow‐up.