z-logo
Premium
Obstructed defecation
Author(s) -
D'Hoore A.,
Penninckx F.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00497.x
Subject(s) - defecography , medicine , obstructed defecation , defecation , pelvic floor , constipation , asymptomatic , chronic constipation , population , tegaserod , biofeedback , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , environmental health
Background In the last decade our understanding of pelvic floor function and dysfunction has improved significantly. A more rational diagnostic and therapeutic approach is now possible for the group of patients with constipation due to obstructed defecation (OD). Methods The review is based on a literature search using the PubMed database focusing mainly on recent literature addressing the subject. Results Obstructed defecation occurs in about 7% of the adult population. Different pathophysiological mechanisms, either functional or anatomical, eventually lead to OD. Different tests (defecography, balloon evacuation test, manometry, electromyography, colonic transit time measurementmanometry) play an important role to quantify the problem. These tests are not without problems as abnormal results are also found in asymptomatic controls. Also, there is poor agreement between different tests and a poor correlation with symptomatology. Thus, for most syndromes conservative treatment including biofeedback is appropriate. Surgery can yield excellent results in selected cases. Conclusion Validation of scoring systems and quantitative tests is still needed. More uniform and strict criteria for anismus should be applied to make therapeutic approaches comparable. Appropriate selection of patients for surgery is the key to success.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here